What McClure Said: “The Story is the Thing” : CJR
Clearing space for the agenda-setting narrative in digital journalism
View Original Article on cjr.org
Shared by 3 people
More from this website
Sticking with the truth : Columbia Journalism Review (cjr.org)
In 1998, The Lancet, one of the most respected medical journals, published a study by lead author Andrew Wakefield, a British physician who claimed there might be a link between the vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) and autism, the developm...
New York Times paywall growth slows : Columbia Journalism Review (cjr.org)
But it remains to be seen whether that’s a one-quarter blip or the new normal
Steams of consciousness : Columbia Journalism Review (cjr.org)
Millennials expect a steady diet of quick-hit, social-media-mediated bits and bytes. What does that mean for journalism?
Paywalls: Maybe Not So Complicated After All : Columbia Journalism Review (cjr.org)
Thinking over Clay Shirky’s piece on the success of the NYT model
Populism and the history of American financial crises : Columbia Journalism Review (cjr.org)
A Columbia professor’s thesis gets credulous WSJ treatment
Medicare Uncovered: What's not on the table : Columbia Journalism Review (cjr.org)
Negotiating the price of drugs would save billions. Why don’t we talk about it?
Newspaper revenue: good news, bad news : Columbia Journalism Review (cjr.org)
Mostly bad as revenue stops its free-fall but ads remain weak
About those "Glory Days of American Journalism" : Columbia Journalism Review (cjr.org)
Matthew Yglesias retreats from his argument, but not far enough. He forgot state and local reporting.
A close watch on Scott Walker's jobs pledge : Columbia Journalism Review (cjr.org)
For PolitiFact Wisconsin’s “Walk-o-meter,” the key innovation is sustained attention
Attack of the climate-denial books : Columbia Journalism Review (cjr.org)
Conservative think tanks fuel publishing boom that spreads misinformation
The enduring myth of the Greedy Geezer : Columbia Journalism Review (cjr.org)
The press too easily accepts the young vs. old frame on the Social Security debate